On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:58:04PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
How much memory does firewalld actually use on F18 when it has
nothing to do?
16MB? That's not the end of the world, but it's bigger than anything else
running in the cloud image. (In fact, excepting dhclient, it's bigger than
*everything else put together*.)
At what point should we become concerned about how
much memory a process is using?
I don't have a magic number, but I think we want to be concerned about all
resource waste, because it does add up.
Does the "no firewall" case still work, at least? EC2
recommends
images with *no* default firewall since they use security groups to
control traffic, and adding a second, guest-level firewall tends to
confuse people.
The current situation is that it works, but only by removing stuff in
kickstart post.
Should the F18 release image explicitly target clouds other than
EC2? *Can* it?
Yes, but I think we'll end up with two different kickstarts. (The EC2 image
won't need grub, for example.) I'm open to just leaving it off for the EC2
image in specific.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>