#22: File F21 change: Ability to install without documentation (w/optional install later) ----------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: Docker (Other) | Keywords: ----------------------------+------------------------------------------ '''Summary:''' In many cases, users will not want documentation on cloud images. We should be able to provide support to create/deliver cloud images without documentation but still have it available for installation if desired.
'''NOTE:''' we need to decide on an image-by-image basis whether we will include the docs by default. Previously there was strong SIG support for leaving man pages in the image for administrator convenience. We should affirm that decision or, if we want to change it, do so intentionally. It's likely that the docker host image _won't_ contain docs but the cloud base host image will. Docker _container_ images more certainly won't.
'''Importance:''' moderate
'''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / should be at least mostly implemented by alpha or will not be ready for this release.
Scope. self-contained
Cloud SIG owner. mattdm
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Optional_documentation_cloud_image
#22: File F21 change: Ability to install without documentation (w/optional install later) ----------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: mattdm Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: Docker (Other) | Resolution: Keywords: | ----------------------------+------------------------------------------- Changes (by mattdm):
* owner: => mattdm * status: new => assigned
Old description:
'''Summary:''' In many cases, users will not want documentation on cloud images. We should be able to provide support to create/deliver cloud images without documentation but still have it available for installation if desired.
'''NOTE:''' we need to decide on an image-by-image basis whether we will include the docs by default. Previously there was strong SIG support for leaving man pages in the image for administrator convenience. We should affirm that decision or, if we want to change it, do so intentionally. It's likely that the docker host image _won't_ contain docs but the cloud base host image will. Docker _container_ images more certainly won't.
'''Importance:''' moderate
'''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / should be at least mostly implemented by alpha or will not be ready for this release.
Scope. self-contained
Cloud SIG owner. mattdm
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Optional_documentation_cloud_image
New description:
'''Summary:''' In many cases, users will not want documentation on cloud images. We should be able to provide support to create/deliver cloud images without documentation but still have it available for installation if desired.
'''NOTE:''' we need to decide on an image-by-image basis whether we will include the docs by default. Previously there was strong SIG support for leaving man pages in the image for administrator convenience. We should affirm that decision or, if we want to change it, do so intentionally. It's likely that the docker host image _won't_ contain docs but the cloud base host image will. Docker _container_ images more certainly won't.
'''Importance:''' moderate
'''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / should be at least mostly implemented by alpha or will not be ready for this release.
Scope. self-contained
Cloud SIG owner. mattdm
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Optional_documentation_in_cloud_image
--
#22: File F21 change: Ability to install without documentation (w/optional install later) ----------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: mattdm Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: Docker (Other) | Resolution: wontfix Keywords: | ----------------------------+------------------------------------------- Changes (by mattdm):
* resolution: => wontfix * status: assigned => closed
Comment:
The actual implementation details of this are actually in place. I propose dropping this as a formal "change". If the Cloud WG votes to leave docs out of any particular image, we can make sure to note that in the release notes separately.
I'm asking for lazy consensus on this decision; if you disagree, reopen this before the change deadline on Tuesday. Thanks.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Cloud Trac Tickets cloud-trac@fedoraproject.org wrote:
#22: File F21 change: Ability to install without documentation (w/optional install later) ----------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: mattdm Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: Docker (Other) | Resolution: wontfix Keywords: | ----------------------------+------------------------------------------- Changes (by mattdm):
- resolution: => wontfix
- status: assigned => closed
Comment:
The actual implementation details of this are actually in place. I propose dropping this as a formal "change". If the Cloud WG votes to leave docs out of any particular image, we can make sure to note that in the release notes separately.
By in place, you mean %packages --excludedocs or something more?
I'm asking for lazy consensus on this decision; if you disagree, reopen this before the change deadline on Tuesday. Thanks.
-- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/22#comment:2 cloud https://fedorahosted.org/cloud Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:29:44AM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
The actual implementation details of this are actually in place. I propose dropping this as a formal "change". If the Cloud WG votes to leave docs out of any particular image, we can make sure to note that in the release notes separately.
By in place, you mean %packages --excludedocs or something more?
Yeah, again, basically just that. Although we will need the %license change in order to do this and keep required license files from being left out.