Hi all.
It is time again to create the list of features we (Atomic Working Group) will be working on for Fedora 26. We want to discuss the features in this week's IRC meeting. But first everyone should put up the ideas to this thread. This will help us to create a proper agenda for Wednesday's meeting.
Kushal
It might be beyond the scope of Fedora 26, but I'd like to evaluate the liabilities (pros, cons and gotchas) of supporting all possible user defined layouts (within reason) out of the box. That is, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, overlay(fs), dm thin. Surely this is a boolean problem, and the setup just needs to know what's being used, and automagically do the right thing.
The most obvious flaw with this idea, is the move to overlayfs is intended to shed the baggage of docker-storage-setup and LVM thin, but ideally I'd like to see atomic support a few sane (whatever that's defined to be) layouts and automatically use them, so we can better figure out what works well, and what works poorly, for various use cases.
Chris Murphy
On 28/11/16, Kushal Das wrote:
Hi all.
It is time again to create the list of features we (Atomic Working Group) will be working on for Fedora 26. We want to discuss the features in this week's IRC meeting. But first everyone should put up the ideas to this thread. This will help us to create a proper agenda for Wednesday's meeting.
The wiki page to put up all the ideas is at [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Change_Proposals_Atomic_WG
Kushal
-
Chris Murphy -
Kushal Das