On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:14:18 PM Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 2011-10-04 12:06, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> > On Oct 4, 2011 12:59 PM, "Max Spevack" <mspevack@fedoraproject.org
> >
> > <mailto:mspevack@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I know that there was work afoot to release the F16 Beta AMi on the
> > > same day as the rest of F16 Beta.
> > >
> > > Is that something that is good to go? And if it's not, what was the
> > > thing that blocked or held up the release of the Beta? The last AMI
> > > that I can see owned by aws@fedoraproject.org
> >
> > <mailto:aws@fedoraproject.org> is
> >
> > > 125523088429/Fedora-16-Beta-ec2-20110923-x86_64-sda -- I played around
> > > with that AMI and while I think there were a few cloud-init issues, it
> > > worked well enough to get the authorized_keys in the right place.
> > >
> > > I'd also recommend that it become part of the schedule and workflow to
> > > update the get.fedoraproject.org <http://get.fedoraproject.org> page
> >
> > with a link to the AMI IDs, as
> >
> > > well as the EC2 Images wiki page itself, with those AMI IDs. Not only
> > > for Alpha/Beta, but definitely for GA.
> > >
> > > Maybe even add a blurb to the release announcement when it talks about
> > > the different ways to consume Fedora.
> > >
> > > To me, those are the sorts of actions that begin to put Fedora on EC2
> > > at a similar level to some of the other architectures, etc.
> > >
> > > Good think Fedora's PM and RelEng are on this list :)
> >
> > And the person who writes the release announcements, right? Heh.
> >
> > I have no idea what the status is. Dennis mentioned the other day that
> > the latest thing he had wasn't working (while we were in milan) - beyond
> > that, without a ticket or etc. i have no idea.
>
> But I do. :) cloud-init is currently doing things that make SElinux
> unhappy in such a way that one cannot log in. Dennis and I are working
> on the problem.
and we sorted it out, so far i have ami-7f5a063a