That's perfect. I did some packaging work on eucalyptus few month ago and went the same way.
On Feb 2, 2010 6:37 PM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote:
Question One:
How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to
change them to more descriptive names:
eucalyptus-sc -> eucalyptus-storage-controller
eucalyptus-cloud -> eucalyptus-cloud-controller
eucalyptus-cc -> eucalyptus-cluster-controller
eucalyptus-nc -> eucalyptus-node-controller
eucalyptus-gl -> eucalyptus-gatherlog
Does anyone have strong opinions on this?
--
Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Computing & Information Technology
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud