On 12/12/2016 05:19 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dusty Mabe
<dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
> After I get a bug[1] fixed and out the door I'm going to publish
> a blog post/docs on setting up Fedora 25 Atomic host and/or Cloud
> base to use overlay2 as the storage driver for docker.
>
> I'd like for everyone that can to test this out and to start running
> their container workloads with overlay2 with selinux enabled and let's
> file bugs and get it cleaned up for Fedora 26 release.
This makes sense as the default for the docker package for non-atomic
fedora, since the alternative is loopback storage -- are you
suggesting this as a change for the atomic host as well? If so, what's
the rationale there?
Overlay allows better memory sharing, so you can run more
containers on
a single host
then you can with Devicemapper.
We are working on patches to docker-storage-setup to allow it to
allocate overlayfs to the
remaining storage similar to what we do with devicemapper for Atomic Host.
> Should we file this as a "change" for Fedora 26?
>
> Dusty
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list -- cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org