On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:16:15PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> think QA clearly understands what cloud image(s) are release
blocking,
> as previously they were just the non-atomic images.
Which images are prominent on the download pages and how much of a
relationship there is between that and 'release blocking' status is
*also* not my problem, but I'd agree with you (Chris) that it'd be
rather strange for the most prominently advertised deliverable for a
given product not to be a release-blocking one.
I don't think that Atomic *needs* to be release blocking, because if it
misses the grand unified release, we have the ability to update it at
the next cycle, so it's less of a big deal. But if we collectively
prefer to make sure everything is lined up on the release day... I can
see arguments for that, too.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader