Re: [cloud] #147: Don't overwrite download location for 2 week atomic images

#147: Don't overwrite download location for 2 week atomic images -----------------------+--------------------- Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Resolution: Keywords: meeting | -----------------------+---------------------

Comment (by walters):

Why wouldn't AWS also be N and N-1?

As far as "picking an image", I think the burden would lie on the the consumer to copy the AMI into their infra, in the same way that people downloading the QCOW2 files are copying.