On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 19:46:28 +0900 "Sandro "red" Mathys" red@fedoraproject.org wrote:
<snip>
When I took ownership of this "external need" (for the Fedora cloud product) I was under the impression we only just (are going to) have Taskotron and everyone knows it's THE way to go.
I personally love collaboration. It would be awesome if we could avoid spreading resources on '3 systems for 1 task'. I definitely want to know more about Taskotron and its movement towards cloud image testing.
That's why I was a bit confused to find there's actually 3 systems. Collaboration is certainly great, but that's not how it's done so let's try to improve on this.
So, would you recommend to keep using your tools or rather go with Taskotron? Or do we do some things in one and others in the other? Or do we try to fully implement your tests in Taskotron and drop doing the tests with your tools?
I still don't understand why this is an either/or. As I mentioned earlier, Taskotron and valid do not seem to be trying to accomplish the same goals. From what I can see, they should be able to be integrated without too much trouble and I strongly suspect that level of effort would be far less than setting up separate systems.
Tim