-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:26:14 -0500 James Antill james@fedoraproject.org escribió:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 13:45 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:13:40PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
So we are not going to be able to do this period. you will only be able to release as Fedora itself releases. doing periodic updated images can be doable
[...]
I think that some of the wording used is poorly
chosen. I think you are actually talking about updates images and not release images. We have no way to determine how big an update set is so that
I'm not sure I understand the distinction you are making here. The images would need to be stand-alone, with all packages included, not just updates.
I _think_ Dennis here is talking about the difference between fedora/updates ... and that if we have a "release" image of say F21 then that would be thought of like the fedora tree/repo. and couldn't be changed ever. But that's not we want to do anyway. And we could do "update" images, which would be new images in addition to the release image (what we all want, I think).
James is pretty spot on, a release image would be F20 F21 F22 etc and updates image would be F20+updates. its to do with the fedora release the images line up with.
note if we have 3 supported fedora releases at a time we would need to be making and testing 3 lots of updates images.
Dennis