On 04/22/2016 11:58 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
* I will expect Joe B from the Cloud WG to tell us authoritatively
through the *marketing* list exactly what should happen next, since
he (correctly) raised the issue of ensuring zero confusion over
publishing these articles.
Ideally this should have been settled between Cloud WG and rel-eng
before an article was proposed. But failing that, we shouldn't
schedule any Magazine post about changes in deliverables without
clearly knowing it's decided. (To be fair, that seemed to be the case
for at least a week, until dgilmore raised an objection.) Better
communication will fix similar problems in the future.
Correct. This *was* decided, and then a question was raised. I don't
want to second-guess the second-guessing, because it was
well-intentioned and we're all communicating in like 15 different venues
and ... ugh. Communication is hard, kids.
I agree with Dusty's post earlier, I think we should stick with the
message that we are doing away with 32-bit cloud images irrespective of
other 32-bit images/etc. We don't at the moment have the resources, or
frankly interest, in doing much with 32-bit x86 cloud images.
I'm CC'ing Dennis directly in case cloud@ and marketing@ are not on his
"read immediately" list. :-)
WG folks: Please respond with a +1 or -1. Other votes welcome too.
Alternate proposals welcomed, but we should move quickly. Happy Friday.
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/