On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:26:43AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
At least one view of the model is that you have atomic upgrades, and thus. rollback/downgrades. This fits perfectly with the f21/f21/f23 release model (although "rpm-ostree rebase" is very surprising when it deletes your refs, you can still atomic downgrade). Certainly one of the benefits of ostree, to me, is that it should be possible to freely move between N stable releases.
I agree. And since we're making the packages from which the Atomic versions will be composed, what's the _downside_ of making releases available as distinct releases? Since it's produced from RPMs that we're making automatically, isn't it basically something we can offer to users with very little effort?