On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 11:11:04AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:29:21PM -0800, graziano obertelli wrote:
> question, which may be answereed but some directed google search. The
> first one of which is this one: so far we used xen as the hypervisor of
> choice on CentOS (and RHEL), but I know that now both are included in
> Fedora. Which one is the preferred one? Which one should be the Eucalyputs
> default?
I've only used it with xen at this point; is there more to this change than
changing HYPERVISOR="xen" to HYPERVISOR="kvm" in the configuration
file?
That should be it: we will do the testing with kvm. At time we have
problem with kvm versions and EBS, or kvm and libvirt or policykit: we
just need to test and be sure that the user eucalyptus can drive libivirt
and can run images off the instance directory.
Also, did you see my suggestion the other day on the subpackage
names?
Yes, absolutely. I'm not sure we can change the packages name this late in
the cycle, but we are investigating it.
cheers
graziano
--
Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Computing & Information Technology
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
--
Graziano Obertelli
Eucalyptus Systems, Inc.
130 Castilian St. Goleta, CA 93117
Office: 805-845-8000
www.eucalyptus.com