[EMAIL FROM ZACK:] Re: cloud Digest, Vol 86, Issue 3
by Zack Cylinder
I can't make it ot the meeting today Sorry!
Zack Cylinder
Cloudbakers
Cloud Training Specialist
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:28 AM, <cloud-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> Send cloud mailing list submissions to
> cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
> cloud-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cloud-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cloud digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: tunir tests: what's this useradd-not-found failure?
> (Trishna Guha)
> 2. Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas (Thomas Mueller)
> 3. [atomic-wg] Issue #173 `Fedora Cloud Base Vagrant Boxes Don't Allow
> Vagrant User To su To Other Users`
> (Dusty Mabe)
> 4. [atomic-wg] Issue #173 `Fedora Cloud Base Vagrant Boxes Don't Allow
> Vagrant User To su To Other Users`
> (Trishna Guha)
> 5. Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas (Matthew Miller)
> 6. Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas (Thomas Mueller)
> 7. Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas (Dusty Mabe)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:54:11 +0530
> From: Trishna Guha <trishnaguha17(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: tunir tests: what's this useradd-not-found failure?
> To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>, Matthew Miller
> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAHNm_w=1fP48vhGtMjceB-qR=e1HbHm0pK58SKFTqKk3Nt_cmQ@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
> > I'm looking at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/740, where
> > there is a failure in the Fedora Cloud Base vagrant-libvirt image (yet
> > vagrant-virtualbox and others are fine).
> >
> > The specific failure (with whitespace removed) from
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/1984/output is:
> >
> > command: ## sudo python3 -m unittest
> > tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit -v
> > status: False
> > test_audit (tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit)
> > Tests audit ... FAIL
> > ======================================================================
> > FAIL: test_audit (tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit)
> > Tests audit
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/home/vagrant/tunirtests/nongatingtests.py", line 265, in
> test_audit
> > self.assertIn('useradd', f)
> > AssertionError: 'useradd' not found in ''
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ran 1 test in 0.140s
> > FAILED (failures=1)
> >
> > How is it that useradd is not found in this image but everything else
> > works and other images are fine?
> >
>
> Interestingly this test passes for me:
>
> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo python3 -m unittest
> tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit -v
> test_audit (tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit)
> Tests audit ... ok
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 0.280s
>
> OK
>
> Also I have tested the commands and checked the audit log *manually*
> which looks fine to me (Nothing missing in there).
> Not sure why it failed on autocloud.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Trishna Guha
>
> trishnaguha17(a)gmail.com
> trishnag.wordpress.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:43:47 +0100
> From: Thomas Mueller <thomas(a)chaschperli.ch>
> Subject: Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas
> To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID: <ab815037-c074-9064-f611-3c9511c98ca1(a)chaschperli.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>
> Hi Dusty
>
> Am 31.01.2017 um 19:05 schrieb Dusty Mabe
>
> > On 01/30/2017 04:00 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Wasn't the fedora/25-cloud-base updated too?
> >>
> >> https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/25-cloud-base lists v20161122
> >> (last release 2 months ago).
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Unfortunately we only officially "release" the Atomic images every two
> > weeks. We'd like to release the cloud base image more often but don't
> > currently have enough resources to QA them and produce them more
> > regularly.
> >
> > Note: We do regularly build the cloud images as part of the 2 week atomic
> > process, but we don't officially "release" them.
>
> what is the work to be done to QA the release?
>
> we use the fedora vagrant boxes to run acceptance tests for e.g. the
> selinux module (https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-selinux).
>
> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
> than atomic for vagrant.
>
>
> - Thomas
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:31:13 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Dusty Mabe <pagure(a)pagure.io>
> Subject: [atomic-wg] Issue #173 `Fedora Cloud Base Vagrant Boxes Don't
> Allow Vagrant User To su To Other Users`
> To: cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Message-ID:
> <atomic-wg-ticket-9ec1ed8774ce461b8dc074191ddc10d9-71820@pagure>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
> ``
> trishnag, currently still the same - it won't matter if we fix it now
> because we have not been releasing cloud base images so even if we fix it
> it would not get released for the cloud base image until f26. That is
> unless we decide to release a newer version of the cloud base image
>
> ``
>
> To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
> https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:33:16 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Trishna Guha <pagure(a)pagure.io>
> Subject: [atomic-wg] Issue #173 `Fedora Cloud Base Vagrant Boxes Don't
> Allow Vagrant User To su To Other Users`
> To: cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Message-ID:
> <atomic-wg-ticket-9ec1ed8774ce461b8dc074191ddc10d9-71821@pagure>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> trishnag added a new comment to an issue you are following:
> ``
> @dustymabe ACK! I have the PR ready for the test
> https://github.com/kushaldas/tunirtests/pull/58
> ``
>
> To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
> https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 08:41:46 -0500
> From: Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas
> To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID: <20170203134146.GA5101(a)mattdm.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
> > than atomic for vagrant.
>
> Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough
> downloads of Atomic yet to bump it to the front page when you search
> for "Fedora".
>
> Is there any way to get download numbers over time? That would be very
> interesting.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:19:47 +0100
> From: Thomas Mueller <thomas(a)chaschperli.ch>
> Subject: Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas
> To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID: <0163a162-81fe-4fc2-08c3-ea128a9904b8(a)chaschperli.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>
>
> Am 03.02.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Matthew Miller:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> >> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
> >> than atomic for vagrant.
> > Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough
> > downloads of Atomic yet to bump it to the front page when you search
> > for "Fedora".
> Google Search: Fedora Atomic
>
> * (1st hit: www.projectatomic.io/)
> * 2nd hit: https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/
> * click: download now
> * click: vagrant downloads
> * click: View downloads using vagrant tools
>
> Google Search: Fedora Cloud
> * (first hit: fedora atomic (https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/))
> * 2nd hit: https://getfedora.org/de/cloud/download (redirect to
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/de/cloud/)
> * no information about howto use with vagrant directly, only possiblity
> to download or "Want try Atomic" link at the bottom.
>
> Google Search: Fedora
> * Fedora Atomic "sub-link" (category link? don't know how they are
> called) on first hit
> * no Fedora Cloud on first page
>
>
> IMHO:
> * Even search for Fedora Cloud brings Atomic on top
> * better information about Atomic then for cloud base (for vagrant use
> case)
>
> Conclusion: i don't think downloads for cloud base are better because of
> people searching find it better.
>
> >
> > Is there any way to get download numbers over time? That would be very
> > interesting.
>
> I think the future is containers. but right now most people are still
> not ready to start full containerization. Another question is if people
> are using vagrant with Atomic. I use it to run tests. if possible i run
> tests in docker because of lower overhead - I would not use vagrant to
> start an Atomic vm to run a container in it I think.
>
> - Thomas
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:27:42 -0500
> From: Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com>
> Subject: Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas
> To: cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Message-ID: <8283ce62-a468-e2c7-2fd7-46424dbb587f(a)dustymabe.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>
>
> On 02/03/2017 09:19 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 03.02.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Matthew Miller:
> >> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> >>> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
> >>> than atomic for vagrant.
> >> Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough
> >> downloads of Atomic yet to bump it to the front page when you search
> >> for "Fedora".
> > Google Search: Fedora Atomic
> >
> > * (1st hit: www.projectatomic.io/)
> > * 2nd hit: https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/
> > * click: download now
> > * click: vagrant downloads
> > * click: View downloads using vagrant tools
> >
> > Google Search: Fedora Cloud
> > * (first hit: fedora atomic (https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/))
> > * 2nd hit: https://getfedora.org/de/cloud/download (redirect to
> > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/de/cloud/)
> > * no information about howto use with vagrant directly, only possiblity
> > to download or "Want try Atomic" link at the bottom.
> >
> > Google Search: Fedora
> > * Fedora Atomic "sub-link" (category link? don't know how they are
> > called) on first hit
> > * no Fedora Cloud on first page
> >
> >
> > IMHO:
> > * Even search for Fedora Cloud brings Atomic on top
> > * better information about Atomic then for cloud base (for vagrant use
> case)
> >
> > Conclusion: i don't think downloads for cloud base are better because of
> > people searching find it better.
> >
>
> I think what he was alluding to is that if you search for fedora on
> Atlas [1] then you don't see atomic, which means that the cloud base
> images could be getting selected because people don't know they are
> there. This is because they are sorted by # of downloads, which is
> fine.
>
> [1] https://atlas.hashicorp.com/boxes/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&
> sort=&provider=&q=fedora
>
> >>
> >> Is there any way to get download numbers over time? That would be very
> >> interesting.
> >
> > I think the future is containers. but right now most people are still
> > not ready to start full containerization. Another question is if people
> > are using vagrant with Atomic. I use it to run tests. if possible i run
> > tests in docker because of lower overhead - I would not use vagrant to
> > start an Atomic vm to run a container in it I think.
> >
>
> I agree with you that running Atomic in Vagrant can be considered less
> useful to some people than running a mutable OS in Vagrant. At least
> for me, part of the reason to run something in Vagrant is because you
> want to do something (install rpms, hack up storage, test something) that
> you don't want to do on your host. If you aren't running containers
> Atomic would not be interesting to you in a Vagrant box at this point.
>
> Dusty
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list -- cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of cloud Digest, Vol 86, Issue 3
> ************************************
>
7 years, 2 months
tunir tests: what's this useradd-not-found failure?
by Matthew Miller
I'm looking at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/740, where
there is a failure in the Fedora Cloud Base vagrant-libvirt image (yet
vagrant-virtualbox and others are fine).
The specific failure (with whitespace removed) from
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/1984/output is:
command: ## sudo python3 -m unittest
tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit -v
status: False
test_audit (tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit)
Tests audit ... FAIL
======================================================================
FAIL: test_audit (tunirtests.nongatingtests.TunirNonGatingtestaudit)
Tests audit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/vagrant/tunirtests/nongatingtests.py", line 265, in test_audit
self.assertIn('useradd', f)
AssertionError: 'useradd' not found in ''
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.140s
FAILED (failures=1)
How is it that useradd is not found in this image but everything else
works and other images are fine?
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
7 years, 2 months