Regrets for today's meeting
by Joe Brockmeier
Hey all,
Apologies for missing meetings lately, and... won't be able to make this
week either due to attending OSCON. :-(
Will try to keep an eye on meeting minutes to see if there's anything
needed on my end. Summer/conference season is cray cray.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
8 years, 9 months
Re: Does Fedora 22 Atomic host install on real hardware for anyone else?
by Robert Knight
Hi, Colin.
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:59:57 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
>> Failed to pull from repository: g-io-error-quark://run/install/repo/
>> content/repo: open: No such file or directory (1)
> This sounds likehttps://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/104
Just to get this clear, here are things I learned:
1. Anaconda's screen switching is not what I thought. To get to the
command line, one must use ctrl-F1, ctrl-B, 2. I believe at one time
ctrl-F2 did the same thing, but it does not now. Once I discovered
this, I could start debugging my problem.
2. My institution uses a very ancient DHCP server that does not work
with the modern Anacondas at all, so I have to specify, on the kernel
command line, all of the networking parameters to have anything work. I
was using one of our local DNS servers as the only DNS. This does not
work and I did not chase it beyond discovering that there were no routes
available to the installer. However, if I use the Google DNS 8.8.8.8,
there are routes and the installation does succeed.
3. Somehow, the availability of the routes allows the mounting of the
repo from the installation CD.
Thanks to those who responded. I hope this adds to the group's knowledge.
Regards,
Robert
8 years, 9 months
Re: Cloud image use cases
by Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:35:14PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> It sounds like "atomic" is more of a flavor than a product. There's a
> proposal on desktop@ for Atomic Workstation. Is the Server WG
> interested in an atomic variant as well?
I think that's "Atomic" Workstation, with "Atomic" in quotes - unless
there's a lot of change in both projects, think it'd be more confusing
than not to actually call it that.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
8 years, 9 months
Cloud SIG release work
by Paul W. Frields
Hi Cloud SIG folks, I wanted to let you know that David Gay is
pursuing other opportunities outside the Fedora Engineering team at
Red Hat. He told me he wants to continue to contribute to Fedora, so
you may still see him around.
In the meantime, I'm working with Kushal Das and others as needed to
pick up the critical tasks David was handling as part of his day job,
so Fedora releases aren't unduly affected. If and when Red Hat opens
up a slot for that position, I'll let the community know. Thanks as
always for your contributions and your understanding!
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
8 years, 9 months
Does Fedora 22 Atomic host install on real hardware for anyone else?
by Robert Knight
I've tried various pieces of hardware (all Dell) with the Atomic host
image (Fedora-Cloud_Atomic-x86_64-22.iso) unsuccessfully.
Am I using the wrong iso?
The symptom is the same every time. Once installation actually starts,
anaconda crashes with
The following error occurred while installing. This is a fatal error and
installation will be aborted.
Failed to pull from repository: g-io-error-quark://run/install/repo/
content/repo: open: No such file or directory (1)
Alt-F2 does not give me a shell, so at this point, I'm stuck trying to
locate what is wrong.
Suggestions?
8 years, 9 months
Cloud image use cases
by Josh Boyer
Hi All,
I was hoping someone could clarify the use cases for the cloud image,
particularly in light of the reductions being looked at (like removing
python). I ask because I honestly don't know what purpose the cloud
image is serving any longer.
The atomic image is squarely targeted at being small, and for running
containers. It is somewhat positioned as a CoreOS solution. With
that being the case, I'm curious how the cloud image is different and
not a repetitive image simply not using the atomic mechanisms.
thanks.
josh
8 years, 9 months
/usr/bin/ps missing from fedora:22 docker base image
by Brian Exelbierd
Hi,
It appears that /usr/bin/ps was dropped as it was an indirect dependency
in f21. Can we put it back? If this was a purposeful decision, can
someone point me at the thread as I couldn't find the discussion.
The dependency chain, for those interested was:
procps needed by initscripts needed by dhclient|ppp needed by
NetworkManager needed by rolekit needed by
fedora-release-server|generic-release-server needed by generic-release
needed by fedora-repos needed by fedora-release
Thank you.
regards,
bex
8 years, 9 months