感谢 Gerard Braad 这么卖力的宣传我们的本土 Fedora 社区。 为了 FUDCON APAC 能在北京举行,我们能不能也活跃一点呢? 让 Fedora 知道 Fedora China 要比 India 还要活跃,还有吸引力。 而我们能做的,最简单的就是去更新这个 Wiki 页面,让 Fedora 社区知道中文社 区的活力: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Bid_for_Beijing_2011/zh
之前 Tommy He 已经发了这个 Wiki 的链接,结果后来的讨论水了。 在此在下还是希望,做为一个 Fedora 中文社区的成员,一起努力一下吧。
谢谢 Gerard Braad
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Ambassadors] FUDCon APAC bids Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:00:13 +0800 From: Gerard Braad gbraad@fedoraproject.org Reply-To: ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org To: ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Jared K. Smith jsmith@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:58 PM, inode0 inode0@gmail.com wrote:
I've not been very helpful in this discussion and about all I can say is that Neville is exactly right. I have no idea how one could ever choose between them without some high-level project goals in mind. I'd like to select both, one for 2011 and the other for 2012 right now!
I think that sentiment is well and good, but I also know that the Malasian team declined to bid for 2011 but would very much like to put together a bid for 2012. In the interest of fairness, we'll be opening up bids for FUDCon APAC 2012 just as soon as we announce the winning bid for 2011, and shoot to have FUDCon APAC 2012 somewhere in the June/July/August timeframe.
I believe both communities are important and exactly for the same reasons as Neville. I can only say that any help to the Chinese community is a win for the long-term. No matter what the outcome will be, I am sure this will be seen as an inspiration. However, I am also worried that most of the Chinese members are not able to attend the Indian FUDCon. As mentioned earlier, it would be wise to have someone who can decide for us based on metrics, but also with a good understanding of both options.
About the timeframe for APAC 2012? I would say that is later and certainly NOT the ideal period; baking hot temperatures ;-)
Gerard