-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-buildsys-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of
> Clark Williams
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:56 AM
> To: Discussion of Fedora build system
> Subject: Re: mock SELinux policy as RPM package
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
>> the question of a package of the mock SELinux policy from
>> has come up a few times in the past, and I have made an RPM
> package for
>> my own use some time ago:
>> It doesn't have all the bells and whistles Paul Howarth has
> mentioned in
> dules yet
>> (my package predates that document by several weeks), but
> should be too
>> difficult to adapt if someone is interested.
>> (This is my second try to post here as my last message seems to have
>> been eaten by the moderation system.)
> - From a quick read of the Wiki, it looks like there are packages that
> fail to build on FC5 hosts due to policy problems (I didn't realize
> that). This means to me that we should add a loadable policy
> module as
> part of the mock package.
> Seth, Michael, Dan, et al, what do you guys think?
I think it would be a good idea to package an selinux policy directly in with the mock
package. This would give people a good starting place for tweaking if they have problems,
and encourage them to send their fixes upstream.
Hans policy might be a good starting point if it passes review by somebody who knows more
about selinux than I do.
Yeah, you and I are in the same boat. I can *spell* SELinux, but that's
about it. I'll poke around a bit with the policy and see what it would
take to integrate it. Might be able to get Dan Walsh to look at it as well.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----