-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dne 17.3.2016 v 15:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:24:30 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 17.3.2016 v 14:10 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
>> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:55:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>> I just discovered - by coincidence - that Koji is already using DNF
> for F24
>>> So unless somebody object I will change mock default config for F24
> to use
>>> DNF too.
>> It was announced correctly The change was made in rawhide 5 months
>> there is no way we would change f24 back to yum after having build
>> using dnf
> Please make sure that Koji as well as Mock are (not)installing weak
Koji is installing them.
Yes, I know and I also know the mock does not install them by default.
That was the point I wanted to made.
I have asked FPC to decide how they should be
Any ticket number by a chance?
do note that yourchanges around rubypick have caused issues because
for soem reason dnf is aacting different on different arches about
it. so if
we enforce weak dependencies not being installed you will have a lot
to fix up all the ruby packages
I am fine with that work, since it is step in right direction ... and it
was workarounded by Peter anyway.
TBH, since it seems secondary arches are currently doing just fine
without weak dependencies installed (due to some weird DNF bug), I'd say
that it should be fine to not install them on primary arches.
buildsys mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----