On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:51 -0500, Mike McLean wrote:
Chris Weyl wrote:
> I like the idea, if it makes things more stable for a plague
> implementation. How would it be handled tho? Different rpms for the
> different groups? (e.g., buildsys-base, buildsys-minimal, etc, etc)
> Or one big rpm?
If we pursue this I recommend we use a more isolated naming scheme.
Someone might conceivably want to build a real package named
buildsys-base. Perhaps mock-abstract-group-{base,minimal,...}
just easier to have them as variables of: base, minimal, build
I would like to have the original behavior available via
configuration.
Surely yum will continue to have a groupinstall command.
why would you want to continue to support the buildgroups.xml file
format in mock? What does it benefit to maintain both sets of the code?
-sv