skvidal(a)phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) writes:
> > I'm not talking about using the distro provided
comps.xml - I'm
> > talking about using that format for specifying the packages
> > installed in the chroots.
> What would be the advantage of this? You will have to maintain yet
> another configuration file with an ugly format (XML), and it will not
> work with other depsolvers like apt or smartpm.
Right, I'm having trouble trying to figure out why we're bothering with
support for other depsolvers at this time. We just need to build now.
When we want to build now, I do not understand why code for new
technology (comps.xml) shall be added, while existing technology
(manual package-lists) is already working...