2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com>:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:53 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> 2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com>:
> > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:01 -0600, Joe Nall wrote:
> >> Sorry, I wasn't clear. Not an interactive install.
> >
> > Doesn't matter. Put the packages in the ks file you feed pungi and
> > they'll wind up in the compose, regardless if they get used later.
>
> Would this require a second ks file that omits the package name, for
> the automated install, so that it will be on the media, but not
> actually installed by default?
>
There is no requirement that the ks file you use to compose is the same
ks file you use to install. In fact, them being so is somewhat silly,
as if you have a local mirror, just do your installs over the network,
instead of doing a compose and then installing from media.
I got the impression that Joe Nall was trying to use the same ks file.
Hence i asked, so we could all be clear on the details. :)
-Yaakov