On Monday, June 29, 2020 11:23:21 PM CEST PGNet Dev wrote:
On 6/29/20 9:23 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, June 29, 2020 6:05:39 PM CEST PGNet Dev wrote:
>> now, to wait for needed COPR fixes and push this all there ...
>
> What fixes do you have in mind?
the issue I'd raised in an earlier thread ...
Hmm, I don't see BuildArch problems mentioned anywhere :-( but I may be
missing something. Please report _copr_ issues in [1] or on
copr-devel list [2].
atm copr builds fail as follows, for specs/srpms that build/install
OK locally
with both rpmbuild & mock,
...
stderr: error: No compatible architectures found for build
can't parse specfile
You may get either x86_64 or aarch64 builders at this moment for your
source build (and we are waiting for ppc64le to be re-assembled so we can
use them, too). ...
despite explicitly setting
BuildArch: x86_64
... But by this statement you _declare_ a build failure on any non-x86_64
architecture. This is something you probably never want (I checked Fedora
packages, and none of ~22k packages uses this).
[1]
https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issues
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahost...
Pavel