On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:07:33 -0500
Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us> wrote:
On Friday, March 18, 2016 10:47:58 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dne 17.3.2016 v 15:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > On Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:24:30 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 17.3.2016 v 14:10 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> >>> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:55:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>>> I just discovered - by coincidence - that Koji is already
> >>>> using DNF
> >>
> >> for F24
> >>
> >>>> builds.
> >>>>
> >>>> So unless somebody object I will change mock default config
> >>>> for F24
> >>
> >> to use
> >>
> >>>> DNF too.
> >>>
> >>> It was announced correctly[1] The change was made in rawhide 5
> >>> months
> >>
> >> ago,
> >>
> >>> there is no way we would change f24 back to yum after having
> >>> build
> >>
> >> rawhide
> >>
> >>> using dnf
> >>
> >> Please make sure that Koji as well as Mock are (not)installing
> >> weak dependencies.
> >
> > Koji is installing them.
>
> Yes, I know and I also know the mock does not install them by
> default. That was the point I wanted to made.
>
> > I have asked FPC to decide how they should be
> > handled.
>
> Any ticket number by a chance?
>
> > do note that yourchanges around rubypick have caused issues
> > because for soem reason dnf is aacting different on different
> > arches about
>
> it. so if
>
> > we enforce weak dependencies not being installed you will have a
> > lot
>
> of work
>
> > to fix up all the ruby packages
>
> I am fine with that work, since it is step in right direction ...
> and it was workarounded by Peter anyway.
>
> TBH, since it seems secondary arches are currently doing just fine
> without weak dependencies installed (due to some weird DNF bug),
> I'd say that it should be fine to not install them on primary
> arches.
>
We have taken steps to ensure weak dependencies get installed on
secondary arches
the workaround for explicitly BR: ruby was applied by Peter to a subset
of packages only and unfortunately the problem with weak deps still
exists on s390(x). But it went away on aarch64.
Dan