seth vidal wrote:
we need to make a decision about separation or integration with
upstream
mach cvs, esp wrt mach3.
if we're not going to merge back to mach2 head (which notably could take
a lot of work b/c I've not focused on making that easy with these
patches) I'd rather rename this something innocuous so we don't annoy
thomas with bugs from this version.
yach?
Warren