-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:06:12PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 13:00 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 12:40 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>> Is it time to start writing simple, custom yum-utils just for mock? So
>>> it can call them as a program but also so mock can more rigidly control
>>> its output?
>>>
>> Maybe....
>>
>> Are you talking about stuff that is a part of mock, a part of yum, or a separate
>> package altogether?
> part of mock.
I agree. More of a long-term thing, though. Here is my list of stuff we
need to work on:
1) "inside-out" setuid scheme (part of an overall revamp on how we see
security for mock running. We currently dont have a coherent strategy or
vision).
2) use yum-utils rather than calling cmdline
3) better caching (downloaded yum stuff, chroot cache)
4) more reliable mount/umount
5) Speedup options: ccache/distcc
All good. I agree completely.
Now tell me if my short-term fix for $SUBJECT is acceptable :)
Clark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHBS/vHyuj/+TTEp0RAqVWAJ4lK0QwHJ6Dda8VXQJD+q9ITga5hQCgkWP2
OXs1pxSeTnM6lmoEiv3S2Ho=
=l1bJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----