On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:13:20 -0800
"Brian C. Lane" <bcl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I took a look at pungi and decided that with the state it is in, and
my lack of deep understanding of it, I don't want to tackle
converting it to DNF. So, in order to support the ability to
independently move lorax to DNF and Python3 I've converted the
library call to run lorax as a process.
I'm still undecided about moving lorax to DNF for F22 or not. I'll
probably make a decision on that after tomorrow's Anaconda DNF test
I would rather not change this for Fedora 22.
I *am* going to make the switch for rawhide on Friday though, so
these changes will need to be in the rawhide version of pungi soon.
Rawhide soon will be switching to the pungi 4 development branch and
changing dramatically how we make things. porting that to python 3 and
dnf is very high up on the list of things to do.
I've done multiple test runs and things look good, at least on
x86_64. The only issues I have right now are that the boot.iso is
about 200M larger than the F21 one, and DNF doesn't log transaction
decisions yet so it's hard to track down what's getting pulled in by
Seems like an extra reason not to switch f22 to using dnf for lorax