On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Clark Williams wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a
>> sledgehammer. There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for
>> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a
>> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed.
>
> And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with
> dcbw here.... KISS goes a long way. And while we can say that it's
> configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's
> then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we
> don't break as well as maintaining them for some time
>
So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :)
They were letting you win the argument yourself, to prove how gosh-darned
smart you are, Clark. ;-)
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project ||
fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador ||
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------