Eu concordo mesmo com isso 100% so fico triste por não ter o livna. Hoje
praticamente 80% de usuários fedora usam livna como seu padrão. é muito raro
alguem utilizar o freshrpms.
2007/9/12, Allisson Azevedo <allisson(a)gmail.com>:
Iniciativa muito boa para o Fedora, finalmente um repositório único :D
2007/9/11, Fernando <liquuid(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Agora vai !
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl>
> Date: Sep 11, 2007 3:38 AM
> Subject: Announcing rpmfusion
> To: Discuss a potential merger of some 3rd party add-on repos for
> Fedora <repo-merge-discussion(a)fedoraunity.org>, Development
> discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com >,
> freeworld(a)livna.org, maintainers(a)dribble.org.uk,
> fedora-list(a)redhat.com
>
>
> The Dribble, Freshrpms and Livna teams, already joined by some Fedora
> contributors, are proud to announce the RPM Fusion project.
>
> RPM Fusion aims to bring together many packagers from various 3rd party
> repos
> and build a single add-on repository for Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux.
>
> We don't have a repository ready for end users yet, but we are actively
> working
> on merging the following ones:
>
> *
http://dribble.org.uk/
> *
http://freshrpms.net/
> *
http://rpm.livna.org/
>
> We will have two distinct repositories: free and non-free. Free will
> contain
> Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Packaging Guidelines)
> which
> can't be included in Fedora -- for example because it might be patent
> encumbered in the US. Non-free will contain everything else which is not
> free
> software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines), like software
> with
> public available source-code that has "no commercial use" restrictions
> or the
> graphics drivers from AMD and Nvidia.
>
> Repositories and infrastructure will follow Fedora where possible. This
> means
> using Fedora's packaging guidelines (except for legal), Fedora's review
> process
> for new submissions, Fedora's VCS structure etc.
>
> It will contain add-on packages and not replacements in relation to the
> base
> package set. Whereby the base package set is defined as: RHEL/CentOS +
> EPEL or
> Fedora (Fedora 7+).
>
> It will contain kernel module packages in the main repo, even if Fedora
> will
> drop them (which looks likely as of August 2007).
>
> We aim to provide support for all 'current' versions of Fedora including
> devel,
> for i386, ppc, ppc64 and x86_64.
>
> We hope to attract new Fedora packagers and many other 3rd party
> repositories.
>
> Please join our mailing list at:
>
http://lists.fedoraunity.org/mailman/listinfo/repo-merge-discussion
> ___________________________________________
> Freeworld mailing list: Freeworld(a)livna.org
>
http://livna.org/mailman/listinfo/freeworld
>
>
> --
> LUN : #257752.
>
> W e
> A re
> R ight !
>
>
http://www.liquuid.net
> Jabber: xsl4v3(a)jabber.org
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/slave/
>
> --
> Fedora-users-br mailing list
> Fedora-users-br(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-users-br
>
--
Fedora-users-br mailing list
Fedora-users-br(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-users-br
--
Cristiano Furtado
Gerente de TI - Projetos de Software Livre
Embaixador do Fedora no Brasil
Sites: