Fwd: [fedora-java] XMvn 1.4.0 release notes
by Peter MacKinnon
FYI
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [fedora-java] XMvn 1.4.0 release notes
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:03:02 +0100
From: Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk(a)redhat.com>
To: Fedora Java Development List <java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
What's new in XMvn 1.4.0
XMvn 1.4.0 was released on 2013-12-09. Most important changes
include:
* Minor features
* Limited support for absolute JPP artifact files
Artifact files specified as absolute paths pointing to arbitrary
locations are now allowed. They are implemented as symbolic
links which are pointing to the primary artifact file, which
must be explicitly specified as non-absolute file.
Appropriate suffixes are added depending on artifact version,
classifier and extension. As absolute symlinks can be placed at
any location, configured repositories are not taken into account
and flat repository layout is always assumed.
Absolute symlinks are only created for artifact files and
attached artifacts, but not for POM files. Absolute files for
artifacts with no files (i.e. POM artifacts) are silently
ignored.
* Minor bugfixes
* Fix NullPointerException bug in installer code
* Allow file installation in root directory
XMvn was unable to install files in root directory because of
false assumption that every directory has a parent. This was
fixed in version 1.4.0.
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
10 years, 3 months
Fwd: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package
by Matthew Farrellee
FYI
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 13:32:01 +0100
From: Jochen Schmitt <Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala
package shows no response for open bugs.
Unfortunately, the original bug reporter seems to lost the inerest
to finish the none-responsive maintainer process.
So I would like to ask, if it ok to reassign the bug to myself without
start the whole none-responsive process at the beginnning.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
[1} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017400
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
10 years, 3 months
Bi-weekly BIG Data SIG meeting
by Tim St. Clair
meeting minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2013-12-05/big_data_sig...
Cheers,
Tim
----- Original Message -----
> The following is a new meeting request:
> Subject: Bi-weekly BIG Data SIG meeting
> Organizer: "Tim St Clair" <tstclair(a)redhat.com>
> Location: freenode #fedora-meeting-2
> Time: 9:00:00 AM - 10:00:00 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Recurrence : Every 2 week(s) on Thursday No end date Effective Dec 5, 2013
> Invitees: bigdata(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> Hi folks -
> Lets establish a bi-weekly Thursday IRC meeting to discuss issues, status,
> etc.
> Let me know if there are any issues.
> Cheers,
> Tim
--
Cheers,
Tim
10 years, 3 months