----- "Bill Peck" <bpeck(a)redhat.com> wrote:
From: "Bill Peck" <bpeck(a)redhat.com>
To: "Raymond Mancy" <rmancy(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "beaker-devel" <beaker-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2010 4:46:57 AM GMT +10:00 Brisbane
Subject: Re: Alternative to disable custom columns.
On 01/07/2010 12:48 AM, Raymond Mancy wrote:
> Hi Bill, Just wanting your thoughts on a good alternative to the
disable result column checkbox on ticket51.
>
> The only reasonable alternative I can come up with is the
following.
>
> Initially, in the checkbox list of result columns, have our default
columns selected (System,Status,Vendor...etc).
> Have another link up the top that allows them to populate that
checkbox list with only default values (so they
> can easily go from a heavily customised result set back to the
default).
>
> I'm trying to make it easy for the user to go between a customised
search result and a default search result. If
> they wanted to go between the two quite often it could get fiddley
if they had to do it all manually. Maybe I'm
> overstating this feature though.
>
>
> Raymond
>
>
>
>
Hi Raymond,
Here are my thoughts on testing ticket51 so far.
- Default to having all current columns selected. (The ones we
normally
show)
- Have three "shortcut" links, Select All, Select None, and Select
Default.
- move these to under the checkbox div. I don't think we want to
see them unless we are actually clicking and unclicking checkboxes.
Users will be confused otherwise.
- Remove the "Disable Custom Result Columns" checkbox
Assuming we can get the above correct then we could just have one code
path for the grid.
Easily done.
It would also allow a user to set their preferred columns in prefs.
Sounds good
btw - while testing I received a 500 ISE when selecting
System/PowerType. I think this blows up because of the nested
Power->Type relation. Might need to move PowerType to a Power search
My code base never had the System/PowerType as that was on another branch to my ticket51
branch. If master now has
System/PowerType in it, I'll merge that in and do some testing/debugging/code
adjusting.
object which has Type in it. thoughts?
Thanks!
Cheers