On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:24:49PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 11/16/2013 12:35 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:38:20PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
>>> Hopefully the above helps - it sounds to me like a way to provide an XML
>>> definition directly for local testing + the
>>> RPM to integrate with the alternative harness selection mechanism are
>>> the key next steps.
>>> Then on to the fun part of getting non-Beaker autotest tests running
>>> inside Beaker :)
>> Yeah, getting there. For now how about a beaker patch?
Added to Gerrit: http://gerrit.beaker-project.org/2507
Patches that aren't sent to Gerrit (even small ones) are highly likely
to be lost.
Sorry about that. I wasn't used to the process.