On 02/25/2013 03:29 PM, Dan Callaghan wrote:
I've done one last update of the proposal, I think this
incorporates all
feedback so far:
http://git.beaker-project.org/cgit/beaker-project.org/commit/?id=9534ca9a...
Huh, I just learned something in reviewing the implementation patches
that I hadn't noticed in reviewing the design proposal - the use of 204
to indicate successful operations. Other APIs I have used have just
returned 200 with something trivial in the body like {} instead of
correctly using 204 and omitting the body entirely.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Infrastructure Engineering & Development, Brisbane
Python Applications Team Lead
Beaker Development Lead (
http://beaker-project.org/)
PulpDist Development Lead (
http://pulpdist.readthedocs.org)