On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 03:33 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
----- "Will Woods" <wwoods(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> The remaining milestones and all the other work we're doing is
> definitely all still important. But I think it's time that we sat
> down
> and really tried to finish off the PUATP work - or at least get a
> version 1.0 up and running.
>From the last prioritization meeting I got the idea that we wanted
to prioritize ResultsDB first...? I understood that we would just finish
some semifinished parts - testing depcheck, implementing autotest
labels - and then focusing on having ResultsDB up and running. As
for myself I'm finishing my part now and am prepared for jumping
onto the ResultsDB train very soon.
But we can surely discuss other possibilities of prioritization.
The only important thing is, I think, that we move along together,
so it progresses faster. We can have it as a Monday topic or discuss
it here.
I agree about moving together. We have the "good to have problem" of
having so many critical milestones for autoqa. In one way, this is
great, because there is plenty of exciting stuff to get involved in. In
another, I worry whether we have too many areas that need attention.
Having a deployed depcheck test will be a big win for AutoQA. I asked
Will if there were ways others could pitch in to help make that depcheck
a reality. I look forward to the Monday meeting to discuss balancing
these efforts and hopefully establishing a timeline.
Thanks,
James