#342: Prevent duplicate tests from being scheduled
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: watchers | Resolution:
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jlaska):
I like this solution, but I'm curious why an extra lock file would be
needed. While I'm not tremendously familiar with locking, is it
better/worse/different when using the existing cachefile descriptor and
the fcntl.lockf() function (with appropriate ops LOCK_EX|LOCK_NB,
LOCK_UN)?
As a tangent (and shouldn't affect this patch) ... how do we determine
whether to create a new autoqa library, versus add content into existing
library (e.g. autoqa.utils)?
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/342#comment:2>
AutoQA <
http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project