On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Sanja Bonic <sanja@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks again for leading the meeting and thanks to everyone who participated as well. :)

You are welcome :)

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com> wrote:

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:13 AM Dusty Mabe <dusty@dustymabe.com> wrote:
Hash: SHA256

Thanks Sinny for running this!! I have some responses to the questions
below (and some suggestions) inline:

On 04/03/2018 02:10 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:

> ==========================================
> #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_community
> ==========================================

Might be good if we named this similar to our other meeting, but with APAC in
the title: #startmeeting fedora_atomic_wg_apac. And then the Subject of this
mail could be "Fedora Atomic WG APAC Meeting Minutes".

> Action Items
> ------------
> * ksinny get answer for "Is there any plan to have a default flatpak
>   repo eventually ? e.g. flathub, maybe on provided by fedora, etc"

I think there is a plan to have a fedora flatpak repo (built from Fedora
RPMs) at some point in the future. For now flathub is the way to go.

Hey Sinny,

yes, we need to have flatpaks enabled by default, eventually, since that is the
preferred way to get desktop apps on an atomic workstation.

We are working towards having flatpaks built from rpms inside fedora, which
will give us a repository we can enable by default without problems. Most of
the code for this has been written, it just takes some time to get it deployed
in production.

We also need the ability to have flatpaks preinstalled on an atomic workstation,
so we can stop including things like firefox in the OS image and use a flatpak
for that instead.

I have created tickets for these issues here: