Hi Jon,

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Jon Chiappetta Jon.Chiappetta@senecacollege.ca wrote:

Ok I made 2 different pages:

http://142.204.133.82/jon/builds/timesa.html -- This is based on all buildarch times averaged together for each task and then summed together & compared http://142.204.133.82/jon/builds/.pa.f18.log.all.log.a -- The CSV data file containing: pa pkg , pa task , pa time , sa pkg , sa task , sa time

^^^ we might be ~15 days slower possibly

http://142.204.133.82/jon/builds/timesb.html -- This takes the single fastest buildarch time for each pa task and compares it to the fastest hsv buildarch time for sa http://142.204.133.82/jon/builds/.pa.f18.log.all.log.b -- CSV: pa pkg , pa task , builderA=timeA ; builderB=timeB , sa pkg , sa task , builderA=timeA ; builderB=timeB

^^^ we might be ~7 days slower possibly

Let me know if you have any complaints, suggestions, or anything. I think ive spent way too much time on this heh.

This looks great! Thanks for the work on it. It's great to see some comparisions to mainline to see the actual build differences easily in front of you and the type of builder it was built on. It's heartening to see that the quad core devices are very similar to that of the new mainline VM builders.

For the actual build times I don't think we can explicitly say how long it will be. Also a rebuild isn't serial so a lot of it will depend on the amount of builders available to see how parallelised it can be. For promotion to PA we'll be moving to all quad core 4Gb RAM builders whree a lot of what we have at the moment is dual core 1Gb of RAM. Also a lot of the smaller packages are I/O bound.

Thanks again.

Peter