On 02/06/2015 05:33 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On 02/05/2015 08:28 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 05:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> pcduino3 nano has SATA and Gbit ethernet and is only $4 more expensive
>> than the Raspberry Pi. I like it. I'm not sure why it's not more
>> popular. Maybe cuz it's hard to say.
> Very nice. Does F21 minimal run on it? Does Rawhide support its video?
> I do not see a barrel power plug, so power only through the OTG?
> Also this price seems to be for the board alone? So you have to add in
> a power cable and the special SATA cable (my Cubies come with both of
Correct. Only power through the OTG.
(Actually both micro-usb ports, but I suppose you should use the one
designed for it.)
Correct. Price is only for the board, no cables.
I have F20 minimal on one that I've been using for a build server for a
couple of months.
I have put F21 minimal on the other one I have. But I'm really using
the kernel that comes with it.
This weekend I'm hoping to have time to mess with it again. I want to
get it to run Fedora's kernel. I plan on trying rawhide on it.
I just realized that I didn't ever reply to this.
I wasn't able to get it to book rawhide's kernel on the machine. But I
think that is more because I'm not the best at uboot and kernels.
I did find out some things though,
uboot - pcDuino3 Nano support in version v2015.04
kernel - should be in 3.21
Fedora userspace runs just fine though.
>> On 02/04/2015 02:17 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>> No SATA, no USB3.0 and only 100 Mbit ethernet.
>>> So for storage you are limited to a USB hard disk or a (fast) SDHC card.
>>> Then again at this pricepoint it will be quite popular.
>>> Banana pi, orange pi etc, are all somewhat more expensive but have SATA
>>> and Gbit ethernet.
>>> 2015-02-04 20:28 GMT+01:00 Andrew Gillis <andrew(a)vortexbox.org
>>> That's correct. There is no SATA interface on the Raspberry Pi 2.
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz
>>> <rgm(a)htt-consult.com <mailto:email@example.com>> wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2015 10:43 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> As a follow up of the discussion that happened at the last
>>> ARM meeting
>>> (and because 3 days post announcement of it I'm sick of
>>> myseld:-P ) I thought I'd outline the process for getting
>>> support for
>>> the Raspberry Pi 2 into Fedora
>>> Just a small question...
>>> I have not found a schematic, but the pics do not seem to
>>> show a
>>> SATA interface. Is this correct?
>>> No SATA, I have no time for it; I am already crunched for time.
>>> Though it would be nice.