Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
> mmc/sdhci modules.
kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827
kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457
kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64 FAIL
So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this experimental cpufreq patch,
which is very dangerous.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/f30/f/bcm2835-cpufreq-add-...
Please try to remove this patch at first
>
> I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps.
>
> Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression?
>
> (Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed
> anything like that yet.)
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> The vanilla kernels I have built with:
>
https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch
> As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now:
> Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org