On 05/16/2011 03:47 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 03:17 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/16/2011 03:04 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:43:17 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> On 05/16/2011 02:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:37:43 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/12/2011 04:57 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>>>>>>> Paul Whalen wrote:
>>>>>>>> We are pleased to announce the release of Fedora 13 ARM
Beta3. This
>>>>>>>> release includes additional software not found in Beta2,
most notably
>>>>>>>> Abiword for your word processing needs. Unfortunately at
this time we
>>>>>>>> are not able to offer OpenOffice due to some issues with
java packages
>>>>>>>> ( java experts we could use your help! ).
>>>>>>> Considering that Java only accounts for a small amount of
seldom used
>>>>>>> functionality, I would suggest that building LibreOffice
--without-java
>>>>>>> is probably the way forward for the foreseeable future.
>>>>>> I hope not. I'm now trying to get a Fedora/ARM system
working and
>>>>>> I'll start fixing Java-related bugs. Please let me know
which are
>>>>>> the most important.
>>>>> an updated openjdk would be a good start :)
>>>> Sure. What is the problem here? It just doesn't build?
>>>>
>>>> Andrew.
>>> looks like lucene is missing.
>>>
>>> lucene failed to build
>>>
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93642 there seems to
>>> be an issue with aot compiling the rpms. getting an unresolved symbol after
>>> successfully building things.
I have found the cause of this. It's a gcc bug:
/usr/lib/gcc/armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi/4.4.5/libgcc_s.so should be
a linker script that contains
/* GNU ld script
Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
the static library. */
GROUP ( libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc.a )
but it's a symbolic link to /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 . This causes all
gcj packages to fail to link.
I don't know why this has happened. I am building the gcc package
to try to discover what went wrong.
Andrew.