On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:14:04PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad(a)kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad(a)kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see Hikey 960 anywhere there as supported. It's not currently
>> supported. We'll be supporting Hikey620 (original or what ever you
>> wish to call it) and Dragoonboard 410c in Fedora 27.
>>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architecture/ARM/HiKey
There's no mention of the 960 on that page
Correct. I was more of asking this as I am curious how to translate
the ISO which has an EFI grub and install.img to this weird fastboot
loading mechanism - where you can tweak the partition sizes, etc, via
the fastboot mechanism.
> is pretty funny on explaining how to do it: "Uses U-Boot to boot EXTLinux to
boot GRUB to boot LILO... or something like that."
And version 99, it was a test against the docs template
> And
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Architecture/ARM/Dragonboard_410
>
> does not even exist.
Sure, we're still working on the vendor/device templates.
Ahhh!
>> The 960 support should hopefully come with Fedora 28 but until I get
>> hardware (which might be RSN) I have no idea. Upstream kernels look to
>> be supportable with 4.14 so bootloader depending it should be OK for
>> F-28
>
> Are there any bugs created for it? Or for the HiKey or Dragoboard 410c? How do you
guys track them?
To date mostly in my head because I end up doing most of the work.....
Oh my. If you want somebody to help with the testing, I can try doing
the HiKey 620 tests on the HiKey 960 as well.