On 27 Mar 2013 03:38, "Nicolas Pitre" <nico(a)fluxnic.net> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> We could create a number of uboot headers. Then after loading the
default
> uImage, load a separate uboot header overwriting the first 64
bytes of
RAM.
Please don't engage in those senseless games just to work around a
stupid restriction of the uImage file format.
If uImage is a problem, just don't use it, period. Problem solved. All
the targets supported by the unified kernel are recent enough to have
bootz support in their U-Boot source. Please use that.
Can you substantiate "recent enough"? The bootz option was in my mind but I
have no recollection of how recently it was introduced.
Or, consider the mkimage process as part of the kernel
_installation_
procedure and not a pre-distribution step. But if I were you I'd go the
bootz route for its simplicity.
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm