On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> wrote:
Chris Tyler píše v Po 28. 02. 2011 v 08:11 -0500:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 12:17 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> > Dan Horák wrote:
> > Standard kernels and bootloaders are something that will need to be
> > looked at sooner or later, though. It might be an idea to start looking
> > at what standard supported options might include. The most popular ones
> > I can think of are (in no particular order):
> >
> > SheevaPlugs (uboot, kirkwood)
> > BeagleBoard/PandaBoard (uboot, OMAP)
> > Genesi (uboot, Freescale)
>
> We'll also want:
>
> +OLPC XO 1.75 (openfirmware, Marvell Amanda 610)
summarized at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Team_and_Developers#Arch...
Cool, nice starting point. I have added myself for BeagleBoard interest.
I guess that the nicest way to create a kernel package, would be a
similar solution to the kernel.i686 and kernel-PAE.i686 as it was in
Fedora-12. They came from the same srpm. Alternatively it would be
possible to have different srpms to provide the different boards, but
I expect that this will cost more overhead in providing updates.
Any thoughts?
Niels