Hi Mark,
Would love feedback on the 3.7-rc7 unified kernel on Calxeda HW.
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=102860
Cheers,
Peter
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Mark Langsdorf
<mark.langsdorf(a)calxeda.com> wrote:
Is the 3.7 suitable for testing? Last time I tried, it was still in
bad shape.
If it's good for testing, I'll throw it on a node tomorrow and send some
results.
--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.
________________________________________
From: arm-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [arm-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Robinson [pbrobinson(a)gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:59 AM
To: arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [fedora-arm] ARM kernel moving forward 3.7+
Hi All,
I'm assuming since you've all been so quiet that the 3.7 kernel works
perfectly for the intended platforms (versatile/highbank to date) and
that we don't need to do anything what so ever moving forward (ROTFLOL
here!) or else no one other than Paul has bothered to test it (Calxeda
I am glaring at you). I would like to get this bolted down sooner
rather than later as I really don't want another repeat of 3.6.
Looking at post 3.7 I'm already starting to poke around and prep
things. Similar to x86-32 I'm aiming to basically have an armv7 and an
armv7-PAE kernel. The PAE kernel will support LPAE and the various
virt things that are starting to land in the kernel now so it will be
solely for A15 chipsets. I presume the Exynos5 supports those
features.
So with that I'd like some feedback from the mainline kernels guys or
anyone else that is a kernelly dev sort of person with for/against
suggestions and thoughts.
Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm