[RaspberryPI 3B] [unicorn Hat] [how to configure spi]
by Pierre-Francois RENARD
Hello
I am running raspberry pi3B and with lastest fedora 28 (with kernel 4.16.0-300.fc28.aarch64)
I read from the unicorn Hat that I need to activate SPI using raspi-config ( for raspbian only)
So I tried to do it manually .. and that's when everything did not go so well :)
I understood that I have to tune /boot/efi/config.txt file adding
device_tree_param=spi=on
I guess I have also to add a dtoverlay line but I don't which one ...
Thanks
5 years, 3 months
aarch64 copr?
by Avi Kivity
Hello,
What are the prospects for getting aarch64 copr? Copr is very useful for bringing bleeding edge Fedora packages to CentOS/RHEL users.
5 years, 5 months
Fedora28 / dnf upgrade / no more booting
by Pierre-Francois RENARD
Hello guys,
I am having a strange issue :)
fresh install of F28 aarch64, dnf -y upgrade, reboot leads me to a none booting system.
looking at the console (HDMI) I can see the boot process and it is stucked on starting the root filesystem
(" A start job is running for dev-mapp...2droot.devices (2mins 1s / no limit)")
1/ without any dnf upgrade, the system is rebooting perfectly
2/ I can wait more than 10 min with the same result
any hints? :)
Thanks
5 years, 5 months
Hikey board (620) with Fedora 28 minimal cannot boot
by Zamir SUN
Hi,
Today I am trying my HikeyBoard (620) with
Fedora-Minimal-28-1.1.aarch64.raw.xz. It simply cannot boot.
I confirmed the xz image has the same hash as is shown on the mirror. I
used the following command to write to my TF card.
xzcat Fedora-Minimal-28-1.1.aarch64.raw.xz | sudo dd status=progress
bs=4M of=/dev/mmcblk0
The system failed in dracut init queue timeout, with a warning "Warning:
/dev/disk/by-uuid/9a926ac9-5938-4539-bb79-72f87b36095f does not exist "
However I confirmed the uuid is right for my partition.
Besides, I cannot type anything via minicon to it so I cannot really
debug more right now. I am posting the last block of message via UART.
So anyone have some hints for this? Thanks in advance!
(P.S. Fedora 27 works fine on my hikey board).
[ 222.639468] dracut-initqueue[468]: Warning: dracut-initqueue timeout
- starts
[ 222.639909] dracut-initqueue[468]: Warning: Could not boot.
Starting Setup Virtual Console...
[ OK [ 222.716760] audit: type=1130 audit(1520288415.819:14): pid=1
uid=0 au'
] Started Setup [ 222.738436] audit: type=1131
audit(1520288415.819:15): pid=1'
Virtual Console.
Starting Dracut Emergency Shell...
[ 222.825449] audit: type=1131 audit(1520288415.929:16): pid=1 uid=0
auid=4294'
Warning: /dev/disk/by-uuid/9a926ac9-5938-4539-bb79-72f87b36095f does not
exist
Generating "/run/initramfs/rdsosreport.txt"
[ 222.897318] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 222.956555] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 222.967237] print_req_error: 6 callbacks suppressed
[ 222.967243] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
[ 222.985808] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0
[ 222.991640] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
[ 223.001405] Buffer I/O error on dev mmcblk0, logical block 0, async
page read
[ 223.032457] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.089436] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 223.100132] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
[ 223.114267] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0
[ 223.120128] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
[ 223.129994] Buffer I/O error on dev mmcblk0, logical block 0, async
page read
[ 223.176307] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0
[ 223.182146] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
[ 223.211348] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.268935] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 223.279748] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
[ 223.285597] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 2
[ 223.313471] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.373025] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 223.442453] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.499139] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 223.533285] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.592543] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 223.663611] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.723301] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
[ 223.757851] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req
400000H)
[ 223.817927] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req
1000000)
--
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
5 years, 6 months
couple of questions
by Michael Ciccarelli
I have a raspberry pi 3b+ and I have a few questions
1) I try to boot the Fedora 28 aarch64 raw image I run into an issue with
the "Rx: failed to receive: -5".. I believe someone has a bug report opened
already.. any idea on when this might be fixed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573261
I can only boot the armhfp release as of right now. I guess I'm just
looking for more detail about this issue.
2) if I want to network boot and I can't use aarch64 because of the above
issue what could I use for the boot file for armhfp? I'm familiar with
booting x86 systems and you can typically use pxelinux.0 to start the
process. If you could provide a download link that would be great on
instructions on how to create the boot file would be fine.
thanks, Mike
5 years, 6 months
EspressoBin and systemd
by Timothy Krantz
Hi,
I know the espressobin is not a currently supported board. That being
said, I am happily running a Fedora 27 root filesystem on one with a self
compiled kernel.
Fedora 28 root filesystem halts at boot with system freezing execution.
Fedora rawhide boots ok.
Looking into differences between 28 and rawhide I see the following:
Fedora rawhide
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd --version
systemd 238
+PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP
+GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN
+PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid
ls -l /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1735840 May 11 07:05 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
dnf list systemd
Installed Packages
systemd.aarch64 238-8.git0e0aa59.fc29 @updates
Fedora 28
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd --version
systemd 238
+PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP
+GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN
+PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid
ls -l /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1735240 May 11 07:08 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
dnf list systemd
systemd.aarch64 238-8.git0e0aa59.fc28 @updates
Which looks pretty darn similar to me, down to the git revision.
So, I am wondering where I would begin to look as to why one works and one
fails (on the espressobin).
Would I grab the source RPM's and see if there is a difference in compiler
flags? Or maybe just a difference in compiler versions?
Is it likely that the Fedora 28 version actually has a patch or patches that
are not yet in
rawhidhttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690e?
Is there any chance that this issue is related to this debian issue :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690
Thanks for any input. This is NOT a big problem for me.
Tim Krantz
5 years, 6 months
Re: armhfp builder instability
by Florian Weimer
On 05/15/2018 01:34 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is
>>> particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS in
>>> a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware issue.
>>>
>>> The latest problem was a hang during a build (on
>>> buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org), with this kernel:
>>>
>>> Linux buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org 4.16.6-302.fc28.armv7hl+lpae #1
>>> SMP Tue May 1 23:15:35 UTC 2018 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> This affects multiple builders, so I suspect a kernel issue, not dying
>>> hardware because AFAIK, the machines are independent.
>>>
>>> The issue also affects copying out the log files for Koji, so they probably
>>> do not show the actual place of the hang.
>>
>> There's a stability issue post upgrade, the upgrades moved the
>> underlying hypervisors to RHEL 7.5 and the build VMs to Fedora 28 at
>> the same time, the issue is known and is being investigated/worked
>> upon.
>>
>
> As I'm facing what seems to be the very same issue
> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26957996), I'd
> like to ask whether there's a ticket/bug/issue opened for this that I
> could follow and get some notification when it's solved.
It turns out there already was a kernel bug, which I just made public:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576593
Thanks,
Florian
5 years, 6 months
armhfp builder instability
by Florian Weimer
Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is
particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS
in a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware issue.
The latest problem was a hang during a build (on
buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org), with this kernel:
Linux buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org
4.16.6-302.fc28.armv7hl+lpae #1 SMP Tue May 1 23:15:35 UTC 2018 armv7l
armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
This affects multiple builders, so I suspect a kernel issue, not dying
hardware because AFAIK, the machines are independent.
The issue also affects copying out the log files for Koji, so they
probably do not show the actual place of the hang.
Thanks,
Florian
5 years, 6 months