Re: Fedora with Odroid-XU4 and Cloudshell 2
by searider74
If you mean, can I access the eMMC card and mount the file systems when booted from the SD card, the answer is yes.
Stewart
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
Date: 8/25/17 2:00 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Stewart Samuels <searider74(a)gmail.com>
Cc: arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora with Odroid-XU4 and Cloudshell 2
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Stewart Samuels <searider74(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been working toward getting the Odroid-Xu4 to boot from the eMMC card
> but the system continues to fail in the same place no matter what I try. It
> dumps me into the dracut shell when it cannot find the root partition. I
> suspect one or more modules are not being loaded when booting from the eMMC.
> Following is my serial console output along with some output from the dracut
> shell. Does anyone have any ideas of what to try next?
Can you access it from linux when you have a fully booted system from a SD card?
PS please trim emails
6 years, 6 months
Errors on Fedora 26 with dnf update
by Robert Moskowitz
I built the workstation-xfce image for a Cubieboard2, and did the setup.
First thing I did was 'dnf update'. So far two errors.
On the serial console I saw:
SELinux: Class sctp_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.476781] SELinux: Class icmp_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.482842] SELinux: Class ax25_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.489040] SELinux: Class ipx_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.495230] SELinux: Class netrom_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.501348] SELinux: Class atmpvc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.507516] SELinux: Class x25_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.513357] SELinux: Class rose_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.519435] SELinux: Class decnet_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.525650] SELinux: Class atmsvc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.532119] SELinux: Class rds_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.538095] SELinux: Class irda_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.544111] SELinux: Class pppox_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.550137] SELinux: Class llc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.556027] SELinux: Class can_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.562064] SELinux: Class tipc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.568282] SELinux: Class bluetooth_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.574976] SELinux: Class iucv_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.580936] SELinux: Class rxrpc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.587009] SELinux: Class isdn_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.593073] SELinux: Class phonet_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.599627] SELinux: Class ieee802154_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.606364] SELinux: Class caif_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.612496] SELinux: Class alg_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.618414] SELinux: Class nfc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.624303] SELinux: Class vsock_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.630464] SELinux: Class kcm_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.636452] SELinux: Class qipcrtr_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.642873] SELinux: Class smc_socket not defined in policy.
[ 7053.649012] SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will
be allowed
Then in the terminal window where the update was running I caught:
Running scriptlet: krb5-libs-1.15.1-8.fc26.armv7hl
577/619
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH:
Database environment version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - (-30969)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
6 years, 7 months
Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-08-22
by Paul Whalen
========================================================
#fedora-meeting-2: Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting
========================================================
Meeting started by pwhalen at 15:00:31 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2017-08-22/fedora_arm_...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* 1) ==== Userspace Status ==== (pwhalen, 15:02:29)
* selinux issues are being tracked via this tracker bug, add selinux
map issues as standalone bugs blocking on this rhbz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481454 (pbrobinson,
15:04:02)
* Fedora 27 has branched, packages need to be built for F-28 and F-27,
rawhide is now F-28 (pbrobinson, 15:06:36)
* 2) ==== Kernel Status ==== (pwhalen, 15:11:33)
* latest kernel-4.13.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc27 (pwhalen, 15:11:45)
* LINK: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21394536
(pwhalen, 15:11:45)
* Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm.
(pwhalen, 15:20:15)
* 3) ==== Bootloader Status ==== (pwhalen, 15:20:48)
* uboot-tools-2017.09-0.3.rc2 (pwhalen, 15:22:52)
* LINK: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=955527
(pwhalen, 15:22:52)
* Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm.
(pwhalen, 15:23:00)
* Wandboard Quad - only seeing output from the SPL, resets. (pwhalen,
15:24:07)
* 4) == Open Floor == (pwhalen, 15:24:57)
* Flock(Aug 29th-Sept 01st) - https://flocktofedora.org/ (pwhalen,
15:25:39)
Meeting ended at 15:28:58 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* pwhalen (34)
* pbrobinson (13)
* rric (8)
* zodbot (5)
* jlinton (4)
* satellit (1)
* jonmasters (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
6 years, 7 months
Raspberry pi3 as part of a dock?
by Zoltan Hoppar
Hi
I have seen many times a solution, where HP, and others are selling a type
of dock that provides keyboard, mouse, and keyboard - so I can use as a
full blown desktop pc.
I am thinking lately as I have a RSpi3 that would be worthy to try... As
everybody has stronger and stronger phones, making Rspi3 as host server
with eth0, 4 usb, and hdmi would be more than interesting... Yet I think
using Fedora as desktop for me would be more pleasing, so technically I
really would like to target a drop-in charging usb dock/host/server POD...
that syncing all my files, on usb I can plug an external drive, charging my
phone, and gives a desktop, possibly android or fedora...
My question would be the following:
- How much would be this usable?
- How much would be this reliable?
- Do I need an unlocked phone for this?
Z
--
PGP: 06853DF7
6 years, 7 months
Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-08-15
by Paul Whalen
========================================================
#fedora-meeting-2: Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting
========================================================
Meeting started by pwhalen at 15:00:42 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2017-08-15/fedora_arm_...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* 1) ==== Userspace Status ==== (pwhalen, 15:05:11)
* F27 Selinux tracker (pwhalen, 15:05:51)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481454
(pwhalen, 15:05:56)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
(pwhalen, 15:06:04)
* "A recent selinux- policy update, 3.13.1-269 , introduced a new
permission called 'map'. This seems to have resulted in rather a
large amount of new SELinux denials for this permission in various
cases" (pwhalen, 15:06:50)
* 2) ==== Kernel Status ==== (pwhalen, 15:16:09)
* Latest kernel-4.13.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc27 (pwhalen, 15:16:23)
* LINK: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=954317
(pwhalen, 15:16:23)
* Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm.
(pwhalen, 15:21:42)
* 3) ==== Bootloader Status ==== (pwhalen, 15:21:57)
* uboot-tools-2017.09-0.3.rc2 (pwhalen, 15:22:15)
* LINK: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=955527
(pwhalen, 15:22:15)
* Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm.
(pwhalen, 15:24:07)
* 4) == Open Floor == (pwhalen, 15:24:57)
* Fedora schedule
* Today- Branch Fedora 27 from Rawhide (Rawhide
becomes future F28) (pwhalen, 15:26:55)
* 2017-09-05 Beta Freeze (pwhalen, 15:27:21)
* 2017-09-19 Beta release (pwhalen, 15:27:40)
Meeting ended at 15:31:03 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* pwhalen (40)
* pbrobinson (20)
* jlinton (13)
* rric (12)
* zodbot (6)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
6 years, 7 months
Re: pcduino3_nano networking problem.
by searider74
Is your MAC address changing on your wireless card or your ethernet lan port?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Rance Hall <ranceh(a)gmail.com>
Date: 8/11/17 8:32 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
Cc: arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [fedora-arm] Re: pcduino3_nano networking problem.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Rance Hall <ranceh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Fedora Arm Team:
>
<snip>
>
> I don't understand why two different os'es report 2 different mac addresses
> for the same physical nic. I know you can spoof nics, but I've not set this
> up so it shouldnt be happening.
I'm not particularly surprised, in both cases the "stable" MAC is
generated based on information in the SoC and I believe the algorithm
did change for some reason. Is it stable on that address between
reboots of Fedora?
Under Fedora 25, it appeared that the mac address changed when the hostname changed (like during the first boot wizard).
Under Fedora 26, I didn't notice this behavior so all I can say is that the reported mac address is stable across reboots, but may not be stable across other changes. (not convinced yet, at least).
> Also under Fedora 26 the nic can obtain an ip address via dhcp, but I've yet
> to find a network task it can perform once configured. It can't ping, use
> the tcp stack browse the web, or any other task I tried.
Is the firewall blocking? What does "iptables -L" show?
<snip>
One of the first things I did when troubleshooting was to stop and disable firewalld with systemctl.
Currently iptables -L reports:
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Thanks for your time.
>
> Rance
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
6 years, 7 months
Re: Fedora with Odroid-XU4 and Cloudshell 2
by searider74
This is always good information to know.
Stewart
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com>
Date: 8/11/17 7:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Andreas Reschke <arm_ml(a)rirasoft.de>
Cc: arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora with Odroid-XU4 and Cloudshell 2
On 11 August 2017 at 06:29, Andreas Reschke <arm_ml(a)rirasoft.de> wrote:
Am 10.08.2017 um 12:26 schrieb Peter Robinson:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Stewart Samuels <searider74(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> I'm not getting any output from the Odroid serial port, even from
>> u-boot.bin. How can I tell if the issue is from u-boot.bin or after? Also,
>
> If you don't get output from u-boot it's a u-boot or a physical config problem
>
>> has the initial-setup issue fixed and is it available in the current image
>> download for the F26 spins?
>
> No, we don't respin images once they've gone GA, it will be in F-27
Do I understand: Odroid-XU4 support will be in F-27?
That will be fine.
Possibly. It is always good to check at the beta stage for F27 that it didn't get dropped or corrupted somewhere. This is one of those where the interested party must keep up with versus expecting Release Engineering to do so for them... [mainly because releng has a limited time and energy budget.]
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
6 years, 7 months
pcduino3_nano networking problem.
by Rance Hall
Fedora Arm Team:
I write to ask for your help with troubleshooting and solving a problem
that seems to be unique to Fedora 26 on my pcduino3_nano device from
Linksprite.
The device has an onboard NAND flash drive with an old custom version of
ubuntu installed. I can use this system to verify that the networking
works as expected when the ubuntu image is booted.
I have prepared both a Fedora 25 arm XFCE sd card and a Fedora 26 arm XFCE
sd card.
Under the Ubuntu system dmesg says this about eth0:
[ 19.843724] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 0 IRQ 0 (sunxi_gmac-0:00) active
[ 19.843737] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 1 IRQ 0 (sunxi_gmac-0:01)
[ 30.344377] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[ 34.676435] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 0 IRQ 0 (sunxi_gmac-0:00) active
[ 34.676448] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 1 IRQ 0 (sunxi_gmac-0:01)
[ 34.701645] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[ 39.893312] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 0 IRQ 0 (sunxi_gmac-0:00) active
[ 39.893327] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 1 IRQ 0 (sunxi_gmac-0:01)
[ 39.910555] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
When a cable is plugged into this interface networking works normally.
ifconfig reports that the mac address of this interface is a2:40:c9:6a:6b:f6
Under Fedora 26 dmesg reports this about eth0:
[ 36.478651] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[ 36.655906] sun7i-dwmac 1c50000.ethernet eth0: RX IPC Checksum Offload
disabled
[ 36.669475] sun7i-dwmac 1c50000.ethernet eth0: No MAC Management
Counters available
[ 36.683220] sun7i-dwmac 1c50000.ethernet eth0: PTP not supported by HW
[ 36.744921] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
Under Fedora 26 the mac address reported for the exact same hardware is:
02:4d:05:40:d1:11
I don't understand why two different os'es report 2 different mac addresses
for the same physical nic. I know you can spoof nics, but I've not set
this up so it shouldnt be happening.
Also under Fedora 26 the nic can obtain an ip address via dhcp, but I've
yet to find a network task it can perform once configured. It can't ping,
use the tcp stack browse the web, or any other task I tried.
It isn't fedora itself as I can insert a usb wifi dongle and networking
fires up and works just fine, this tells me there is something specifically
wrong with the kernel driver or some othe part of the system that is
specific to the interface.
I'm willing to help troubleshoot and answer any questions, I just don't
happen to know what would be useful/helpful at this point outside of what
I've already provided.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Rance
6 years, 7 months