On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:50:24PM -0400, David Shea wrote:
On 06/18/2014 02:42 PM, Samantha N. Bueno wrote:
>gtk is being rebased, and gdk-pixbuf2 is being split out into its own
>packages as a result. We rely on a few things that are moving to
>gdk-pixbuf2, so add it as a BuildReq.
>
>Resolves: rhbz#1109298
>---
> anaconda.spec.in | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/anaconda.spec.in b/anaconda.spec.in
>index fd4dae8..5bcbfcd 100644
>--- a/anaconda.spec.in
>+++ b/anaconda.spec.in
>@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ BuildRequires: e2fsprogs-devel >= %{e2fsver}
> BuildRequires: elfutils-devel
> BuildRequires: gettext >= %{gettextver}
> BuildRequires: gtk2-devel
>+BuildRequires: gdk-pixbuf2
> BuildRequires: intltool >= %{intltoolver}
> BuildRequires: isomd5sum-devel >= %{isomd5sumver}
> BuildRequires: libarchive-devel
Should this be gdk-pixbuf2-devel?
Yes. Yes actually. *fixes*
_______________________________________________
anaconda-patches mailing list
anaconda-patches(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-patches