2013/10/27, Joerg Simon <jsimon(a)fedoraproject.org>:
On 27.10.2013 10:32, Nobrakal wrote:
> Recently, some Working Groups has been created . In the most of
> case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
> any representant of the ambassador group.
> I exaggerate, because some developers are ambassadors (like C.
> Wickert, H. Guémar...), but they are in these groups primary for their
> skills in programming. I don't say "they are bad ambassadors", but I
> think developper task + ambassador reprensentant task are too much for
> one person.
till this point i do not understand the intention of the e-mail
> I think it's a great idea to strengthens the links between ambassadors
> and WG. The ambassador is an important link between users and
> developpers, on my mind, he must be in these groups.
"must" is a strong word - we discussed concepts to enforce additional
group-memberships for Ambassadors as requirement in the past without
final results. Is this what you intent?
For me, "must" means an obligation, it's a synonym of "have to".
not a perfect english talker (I'm french ;) ), sorry fot that.
The intention of this email is to remind the importance of
ambassadors. Fedora isn't just a developpers team, but much team withs
different goal (like marketing and ambassador). If we forget one of
that team, it's, always on my mind, a big mistake
Joerg (kital) Simon
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688