On 12/24/2009 04:48 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
> Almost - there's a subtle but important difference I think we (Marketing)
> may have been unclear about when making and talking about our talking
> points, and for that I apologize.
Hello Mel,
You don't need to apologize as a "person" since this is the
responsibility of almost anyone actively contributing (community and
redhat).
Community includes Red Hat folks one would hope.
> The F12 talking points are to briefly introduce the major work
done by
> Fedora contributors *for the F12 Desktop Spin release.* That means that
> talking points for other Spins should go elsewhere - the question is where.
If it is *for the F12 Desktop Spin release.* as you say : please
_remove_ contents
I agree there is some confusion over what the intended audience for
talking points is but this request seems unnecessarily aggresive.
^^ This would be considered by uninformed press as an example where
RedHat is advertising its products first before community's
contributions. We(fedora) don't want bad publicity, don't we ? People
in the past has worked hard to convince public that Fedora is not a
beta of RHEL. I thank RahulSundaram for taking the initiative at that
time.
Since much of the features mentioned in talking points are not included
in a Red Hat product and some of like NetBeans for example, are not
going to be, I don't see the connection whatsoever. The talking points
are derived from the feature list, plain and simple.
Rahul