I think it must be a bit preciser than currently. Why couldn't be Gnome
Desktop Live CD, XYZ Desktop Live CD.
2010/8/6 Mahmoud Abdul Jawad <abduljawad.mahmoud(a)gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio <
> Hi all,
> I'm currently at the Linux booth at the Assembly demo party at Helsinki,
> Finland. I've noticed a few things about the CD covers we have.
> - I might be revisiting a really old discussion here, but because we
> have both KDE and "Desktop" (i.e. GNOME) live CDs here, some people seem
> to be confused about the GNOME CD being called "Desktop Live Media"
> while the KDE CD is called "KDE Desktop Live Media". I think it would be
> clearer if the GNOME/Desktop disk clearly said on the cover that it's
> - Some people also seem to be confused about what "Live Media" means and
> they think they won't be able to install from a live CD. We also have
> Ubuntu CDs here and those don't say anything about being live media, so
> it might be better to either drop the live media thing completely or add
> "installable" or something like that on the cover.
> - I've heard people say a couple of times that the Fedora CD covers look
> better than the Ubuntu ones :)
> Ville-Pekka Vainio
> ambassadors mailing list
in fact, i would like to see fedora treat GNOME as a desktop, not as the
Mahmoud Abdul Jawad
ambassadors mailing list