Hi,
It's time to say something to this. The ambassador program was sabotaged a while ago. All under the umbrella of more openess. The people who sabotaged it had just a little experience and only looking to get their own problems solved.
The ambassador program was once written with quality in mind that this was the right way you just have to look at openSUSE and that the totally openess of their ambassador program (have to look if they call it still that way) and what it brought them NOTHING
The idea behind the mentoring and therefore a selection for the quality made its sense, sure there been some shortages and nothing which could havent been solved. But it starts with undemocratic behavior in past FAmSCo elections, where people made part of this committee even they not been legitimate to be in it. Just study the FAmSCo tickets its all there.
It goes further for making the comment that I find that someone hasnt the skills to be a mentor I was kept away from using the IRC for a month.
I made another comment which did lead to the disable of my FAS for while, I just said that a person should tell all parts of the story not just what suits her/his needs
What you expect from someone who comes in a ambassador meeting and says I work for RedHat and now you must make me ambassador, how nice we keep all logs so its provable.
And this person played a vital role in this changes! Why because there been trouble in become an Ambassador, and is was the own fault
When I have the opinion something should be changed, then I look first what the problems are and what things I want to keep and I try to understand why certain things are like they are. Very often they make sense then.
But nothing like was done.
There been addressed problems which never been problems at all
br gnokii